Sustainable Savings: The difference between ‘spending less’ and ‘costing less’
© 2018 CMC Today and Otto Acuna, CMC

We all have been asked to produce savings at least once, to be efficient, and to look for economies….. Make them sustainable, avoid the “bouncing back”.

Achieving savings is an inherent part of staying competitive, of providing clients with more value, of being more effective and achieving operational efficiency. It is something that comes necessarily with the role of ‘managing’ something. We, as management consultants, are called upon the task of providing solutions for our client’s cost reduction efforts. 

Achieving savings does not necessarily have to do with a strategy of being the low cost option. For those that try to manage their processes optimally, achieving savings is a measure of efficiency, a key performance indicator (kpi). This could be done to maintain a specific level of service, to keep providing value to customers with more profitability, to provide more value or services at the same cost or to react to a competitor that is trying to compete by lowering prices.

Independent of what industry or activity you are in, whether it is a company, a government institution or an non-governmental organization, the truth is, that what is important is not only to know how much things really cost (a basic management task that many organizations have resolved, but that constitutes an aspiration for many others); but also how to obtain the best return on their resources – “how to cost less” – .

The achievement of this fundamental concept is no trivial task: “costing less” is frequently confused with “spending less” and this error inevitably brings to the situation widely known as ‘bouncing effect’.

This phenomena, of which I am sure you have been heard at least once, and maybe even experimented yourself, consists in ‘tightening the belt’ to get to the required goals and numbers, doing enormous sacrifices in people, organizational erosion and planned expenses, just to realize one or two years down the road that those expenses are at the same level or maybe even higher.

This occurs because acting in this way organizations are eliminating the expense, not the fundamental reason that originated the need for the expense. Therefore, these organizations end up ‘rebalancing’ themselves and spending what they need to function properly.

Thousands of organizations of every industry suffer the ‘bouncing effect’ when trying to obtain savings through ‘containing the expense’ or ‘cost containment’, a practice that finally destroys value, affects the moral and organizational culture of the company and ultimately erodes the organization and their leaders.

I must clarify at this point that I do not mean to say that ‘tightening the belt’ and not spending expenses and investments already planned in budget are not a valid strategy to react to an unforeseen need or event. What needs to be understood is that these tactics, by themselves, are not the right way to obtain savings that will sustain over time.

‘Containing the expense’ could very well be a very effective short-term method to quickly react against a pressing need, but needs to be accompanied by fundamental measures that affect why things cost what they cost. The ‘root of cost’ must be attacked, and solving it will lower the cost because the processes, products and services would require less resources (time, supplies, materials, people and other resources) and thus would ‘cost less’.
Independently of what your industry or client you may be supporting, the elusive sustainable savings pass through three basic stages.

  1. Understanding why things cost what they cost and identifying where the tactical opportunities for short-term savings are, as well as the medium and long-term ones to spend and cost less respectively.
  2. Obtaining the tactical short-term savings trying to affect the business dynamic as little as possible. And at the same time, accelerate the decisions that will aid to the structural changes that will make things ‘cost less’ (less work, less time, less resources and supplies).
  3. Perform the fundamental changes and sustain the new way of doing things until this new way ‘fixes’ in the organizational fiber of the company, making it a habit and therefore allowing things to ‘cost less’ naturally.

In our consulting practice in Sustainable Cost Reduction, we support our clients with a 3-step methodology:

  • Find the Savings: Utilizing Activity Based Management techniques, we help the client to better understand the costs, the fundamental causes that generate them, the relationships between the support processes and the ‘core business’, and to identify the tactical and strategic opportunities the company has. The deliverable of this phase is an Opportunities Portfolio with different options for the Client to decide the best way towards Sustainable Savings.
  • Seize the Opportunities: We accompany the client in the process of making the tactical and strategic changes that have been defined in the cost reduction plan and we support in the management of change during its execution. During this time, we provide guidance and assistance to the client to make the fundamental changes in processes, culture and if necessary, organizational structure  to align the organization to a new, ‘less costly’ way of achieving the same or better results.
  • Keep the Savings: As the changes from the plan go into effect, we work alongside with the client to establish the control and management systems that will keep the savings achieved. In some cases, the client may not have the right people or temporarily may not have the time to take on these systems. If so, we can provide the cost controllership role as a managed service based on analytics, where we support the control of costs and the acquisition of new behaviors until the organization ‘fixes’ the new spending habits into its culture. 

This same approach in cost reduction is also applicable in situations where the achievement of eco-efficiencies and environmental sustainability are critical. 

By applying the “Sustainable Cost Reduction” approach in conjunction with our Lean Green Methodology, we apply process management best practices along with the environmental sustainability guidelines of the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), and use the principles of carbon accounting to measure the impact in ‘green savings’
We can also support in achieving certification of such savings under prestigious certification bodies such as “Carbon Trust and others.

 

About the Author
Otto Acuna, CMC, is a member of our CMC Global Institute. For more information his approach to Sustainable Cost Reduction and other services related with optimization and performance improvement, send Otto an email at: info@exyge.com

  • ISO 20700 Self-Declaration Checklist Train the Trainer, Bucharest

    February 26, 2019

    Consulting According to ISO20700  trained by ICMCI   Registration open till Friday March 29, 2019.  Limited seats (only 15), reservation is on first come first serve basis.   In order to provide practical and hands on support for management...

Read More »
Read More »

Subscribe to Our Newsletter